Inequality and Social Welfare
نویسندگان
چکیده
2.2 Inequality Measures and Decompositions ............................................................................................... 78 2.2.1 Inequality measures and the extended Gini..................................................................................... 78 2.2.2 Source decomposition of the Gini and the Gini income elasticity................................................. 80 2.2.3 Application to income and consumption inequality in Mexico .................................................... 82 2.3 Policy Applications of the Source Decomposition .................................................................................. 85 2.3.1 Simulations per dollar spent: Transfers in the Czech Republic..................................................... 86 2.3.2 Simulations with percentage changes: The VAT in South Africa ................................................. 86 2.3.3 Combining taxes and transfers: Unemployment benefits in Chile ............................................... 87 2.3.4 Beyond taxes and transfers: Basic infrastructure in Honduras ..................................................... 89 2.4 Extensions to the Source Decomposition Methodology ......................................................................... 90 2.4.1 Robustness test with the extended Gini............................................................................................ 90 2.4.2 Targeting versus allocation among program beneficiaries ............................................................ 91 2.4.3 Impact of programs and policies on the poor and the nonpoor.................................................... 93 2.5 Impact of Policies on Growth and Cost of Taxation ............................................................................... 95 2.5.1 From inequality to social welfare: Growth and redistribution...................................................... 95 2.5.2 Financing programs and policies: The marginal efficiency cost of funds .................................... 97 2.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................... 99 2.6.1 Advantages of the framework presented in this chapter ............................................................... 99 2.6.2 Limitations of the framework........................................................................................................... 100 2.6.3 Flexibility to emphasize the poor..................................................................................................... 101 Notes........................................................................................................................................................................ 102 Bibliography and References................................................................................................................................ 103
منابع مشابه
Ethical inequality measures and the redistribution of income when needs differ
The paper considers social welfare functions and ethical inequality measures for linear inequality concepts when households may differ in needs. The welfare functions are nested, i.e. separable in the level of welfare attained by the homogeneous subpopulations, and possess a homogeneity property depending on the inequality concept imposed. Several principles of transfers between different house...
متن کاملLinear Inequality Concepts and Social Welfare
The paper presents ab abstract definition of linear inequality concepts leading to linearly invariant measures and characterizes the class of linear concepts completely. Two general methods of deriving ethical measures are proposed. They imply an Atkinson-Kolm-Sen index and a new dual index reflecting the inequality of living standard. Then all separable social welfare orderings which generate ...
متن کاملMobility, taxation and welfare
Income mobility is often thought to equalize permanent incomes and thereby to improve social welfare. The welfare analysis of mobility often fails, however, to account for the cost of the variability of periodic incomes around permanent incomes. This paper assesses the net welfare benefit of mobility by assuming both a social aversion to inequality in permanent incomes and an individual aversio...
متن کاملOptimal Income Taxes, Transfers and Inequality for an Atkinson-Based Social Welfare Function
The paper extends Atkinson’s measure of inequality to incorporate endogenous determination of incomes, with labour supplies responding to the tax system. On the basis of solutions for optimal income taxes using double limit analysis and derived from the social welfare function in this extension, the paper considers how the optimal income tax, transfers and inequality vary with the parameter use...
متن کاملEffectiveness of Social Welfare Programs on Poverty Reduction and Income Inequality in China
the effects of social welfare programs on poverty and income inequality in China in 1989 and 2009. The findings indicate that social welfare programs have played an important role in poverty reduction, reducing poverty rates by approximately 32%. The effects on income inequality, however, were reversed. For example, the ratio of top to bottom income quintiles grew after government transfers, su...
متن کاملA Study on Linear Inequality Representation of Social Welfare Functions
This paper presents a study on the recently proposed linear inequality representation of Arrovian Social Welfare Functions (ASWFs). We correct and show several sufficient conditions on preference domains for the linear inequalities of the representation to form integral polytopes. We also show that a given probabilistic ASWF induces a real vector satisfying the inequalities.
متن کامل